主页 > 科研动态 >

再次败诉后SCIHUB可能被封吗?科研汪的日子好难

来源:未知作者:admin发布时间:2017-11-18 14:50

 

 

再次败诉后SCIHUB可能被封吗?科研汪的日子好难


又是这个话题:SCI-HUB

4个月前,非营利性组织American Chemical Society(ACS)对SCI-HUB提起诉讼,ACS还控诉SCI-HUB的2个ACS镜像网站: pubs.acs.org.sci-hub.cc和acs.org.secure.sci-hub.cc,希望将其停掉 

 

昨天最新消息,美国法院判决被告方SCI-HUB败诉,而原告American Chemical Society胜诉,美国Virginia东区地方法院法官Leonie Brinkema准予American Chemical Society所有的请求,包括480万美元的赔偿金和广泛的禁令,那就是要求互联网服务提供商(ISPs)停止对SCI-HUB的服务,要求搜索引擎如google等封杀SCI-HUB相关域名搜索。

这么多科研狗还没毕业呢,停了,课题思路咋找啊。

 

不过要说ACS是非盈利的组织,有些人肯定不赞同,来自于“reddit”网站的评论,例如下面这几个美国网友。

#The_Gza说 “ACS2015全年总营收是5.62亿美金,而信息服务(论文阅读)就占到了83%,而ACS的总裁Thomas M. Connelly年薪为60万美金/年”

#The_Gza  83个赞

In the interest of transparency, I blasted ElSevier for their tactics on this issue and I'll do the same here. ACS is a not-for-profit organization and their tax forms are public record. If you're wondering why they've now mounted the fight against Sci-Hub (and need proof why they will never drop the price of an article to $1-2 each), take a look at their 2015 statement. This information is all published on the financial section of their website.

Page 1: over $562 million in revenue

Page 11: line 2a, information services (ie, SciFinder and library subscriptions) more than $465 million in revenue (83% of total revenue)

 Page 9: line 17 Thomas M. Connelly salary, over $600K

 

美国网友monkeybutler说“长期以来,ACS伪装成非营利组织,通过减少税收挣钱,但事实上他们是暴利的组织,ACS有会员制,收取高额的会员费,这一套他们玩了很多年了,却厚颜无耻地站在支持科学的道德制高点,连Elsevier都不如的贱痞。”

[#]monkeybutyler 43个赞

Absolutely true. ACS has long pretended to be a nonprofit for tax purposes, but in reality it's a highly profitable publishing company that happens to have a membership society attached. Member dues, which people are always griping about, is about 3% of their revenues. ACS has played this card for so many years, it's tattered around the edges. Yet they keep taking the moral high ground because they "support science" and such. Ask librarians. ACS is more of a pariah than Elsevier - they just get better press.

[回复]AvogadrosSpermCountOrganic  7个赞 

use Sci-Hub more

 

美国网友novel_yet_trivialAnalytical 抱怨道“我要捐比特币给Sci-Hub,离开了学校去外面工作,没有Sci-Hub,我不知道该怎么活下去!”

[#]novel_yet_trivialAnalytical 20个赞 

Time to figure out this bitcoin thing and give some money to sci-hub. Working outside of academics I really don't know how I'd survive without it.

[回复]PipeTrance  5个赞

I used this website for donation: https://localbitcoins.com. Was easy enough.

 

来听听国内小伙伴的心声

这几年,Sci-Hub至今已遭受多次诉讼,日子很不好过,但SCI-HUB让科研狗的日子好过多了。

① 2015年Elsevier在美国对Sci-Hub提起诉讼。

② 同年10月,一家法院做出了有利Elsevier的判决。

③ 11月,Sci-Hub其主站域名和服务器关闭。

④ 2017年6月21日,Elsevier再次赢得了对Sci-Hub的违法判决。

⑤ 纽约地方法院判定Sci-Hub等Library of Genesis项目(LibGen)的网站需赔偿Elsevier出版社1500万美元作为侵犯版权的损失。

⑥ 2017年11月6日,法院判决SCI-HUB赔偿ACS 480万美元并封杀服务器和域名。

To remove all barriers in the way of science

 

耳旁回想起鲁迅的那句名言:真的猛士......

参考文献:

1. American Chemical Society Wins Lawsuit Against Sci-Hub

2.Judge Recommends Ruling to Block Internet Access to Sci-Hub

 

上一篇:没有了
下一篇:没有了